PaperDabba News Desk: 2024-07-12
The Andhra Pradesh government has initiated a vigilance probe against former TTD EO AV Dharma Reddy and former AP Information and Public Relations Commissioner Vijay Kumar Reddy. This decision comes following numerous complaints of significant corruption during their tenures. Both officials have been accused of engaging in large-scale corruption, with several leaders and journalist associations recently filing complaints against them. It’s noteworthy that Dharma Reddy retired last month.
Allegations Against AV Dharma Reddy
AV Dharma Reddy, during his tenure as the TTD EO, has been accused of multiple corrupt practices. The allegations include misappropriation of funds from the Srivani tickets and utilizing the TTD’s resources to collect substantial donations for the ruling party, YSRCP. Additionally, there are accusations of awarding civil contract works without proper budgeting. The state government has taken these complaints seriously, leading to the current vigilance probe.
Allegations Against Vijay Kumar Reddy
Vijay Kumar Reddy, who had moved to Delhi with aspirations to join the central government, has returned to Andhra Pradesh. He faces serious allegations of misusing his position as the Information and Public Relations Commissioner. The complaints suggest that he was involved in massive corruption related to advertisement contracts, violating departmental regulations. With these allegations, the state government has directed a thorough vigilance inquiry into his actions.
Scope of the Vigilance Inquiry
The vigilance probe will not only focus on AV Dharma Reddy and Vijay Kumar Reddy but will also extend to other officials who may have assisted in these corrupt activities. The state government is committed to ensuring that all angles of the allegations are examined thoroughly, and justice is served. The vigilance department has been given clear instructions to investigate the misuse of power and corruption during their respective tenures.
Recent Developments and Government Action
Following the complaints against Dharma Reddy and Vijay Kumar Reddy, the state government has swiftly moved to address the issue. This proactive approach is aimed at maintaining transparency and accountability within the administration. The allegations against Dharma Reddy include irregularities in the Srivani tickets, where he is accused of diverting funds for unauthorized purposes. For Vijay Kumar Reddy, the focus is on the alleged misuse of advertisement funds, where millions were reportedly embezzled.
Conclusion
The Andhra Pradesh government’s decision to order a vigilance probe against AV Dharma Reddy and Vijay Kumar Reddy underscores its commitment to fighting corruption. As the investigation unfolds, the state government aims to uphold the principles of integrity and accountability, ensuring that those involved in corrupt practices are brought to justice.
