The London Bridge attacker Usman Khan had been released from prison after serving half of a 16-year sentence. Prime Minister Boris Johnson said this was “because of changes to the law that were brought in by the Labour Party that I voted against”. So did he?Khan served a sentence for a plot to set up…

Andrew Marr questions Boris Johnson on the Andrew Marr Show

The London Bridge attacker Usman Khan had been launched from penal advanced after serving half of a 16-yr sentence. Top Minister Boris Johnson talked about this used to be “ensuing from adjustments to the law that had been introduced in by the Labour Occasion that I voted against”. So did he?

Khan served a sentence for a space to status up a terrorist practising camp. He used to be then launched automatically after eight years with out a evaluate by the Parole Board.

Mr Johnson tweeted that this used to be ensuing from Labour’s Felony Justice and Immigration Act 2008.

In yet any other tweet he talked about: “Even if four senior judges regarded as that Khan used to be unhealthy, he used to be to be automatically launched midway by ensuing from Labour’s 2008 law.”

Khan used to be at first given an indeterminate sentence in 2012, meaning one with out a fixed pause date. Nonetheless all over an enchantment the next yr, this used to be downgraded by judges to an “extended sentence” of 16 years in penal advanced with computerized free up on licence after eight. He used to be launched in December 2018 after the time he’d spent on remand used to be taken into yarn.

The prime minister told the BBC’s Andrew Marr screen: “His free up used to be primary under the law ensuing from the computerized early free up map under which he used to be sentenced and that used to be introduced in by Labour with the meat up of Jeremy Corbyn and the comfort of the Labour Occasion. I hostile it both in 2003 and in 2008.”

Mr Johnson did vote against the Felony Justice Act 2003. That law intended most offenders shall be automatically launched midway by their sentences, however “unhealthy” offenders on extended sentences had been totally to be launched with the Parole Board’s consent.

It used to be the 2008 law that changed these extended sentences so there shall be computerized early free up with out a Parole Board evaluate.

A Conservative Occasion spokesperson talked about Mr Johnson had “voted by difference Bill on two key votes on the Bill’s passage by Parliament alongside with practically all Conservative MPs and the Conservative front bench raised explicit considerations about computerized free up all over debates on it”.

What’s the evidence?

We regarded by Hansard – the document of what goes on in Parliament – to search out out what took situation.

The law used to be first proposed in 2007 – when Labour used to be in authorities and the Conservatives in opposition. Mr Johnson did vote against both the “programme motion”- which devices the timetable for passing the bill – and the motion to raise the bill over into the next Parliament. Nonetheless at that stage it did no longer hold the measure that affected Khan’s later case.

The most important clause referring to to computerized free up on licence for prisoners on extended sentences used to be added in each place in the document stage – an opportunity for MPs to study and switch the law – in January 2008.

MPs voted on this measure as segment of a community of amendments on 9 January 2008. The Conservatives voted against however Hansard has no document of Boris Johnson being convey for that vote.

The bill then had its third reading the identical day and used to be handed with out a division – a formal vote. The Conservative opposition can have compelled a division however did no longer.

The then Labour Justice Secretary Jack Straw talked about he did no longer rob Mr Johnson expressing any opposition at the time. Edward Garnier, the shadow prisons minister at the time, might maybe well maybe no longer rob whether or no longer Mr Johnson hostile the bill, while Cut Herbert, then shadow justice secretary, declined to comment.

Loads of then Conservative MPs alongside side Mr Herbert, as well to then Labour backbenchers Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, criticised the dearth of time to debate the bill.

The Instances, on the day after the bill used to be handed, carried correct a few paragraphs – the first focal level used to be practically entirely on a segment of bill that stopped penal advanced officers from striking.

What claims operate you will must have BBC Truth Take a look at to investigate? To find in contact

Read more from Truth Take a look at

Apply us on Twitter

About the author

NewsRoom Paperdabba